Files
homarr/docs/perf/METHODOLOGY.md
T
Thomas Camlong c73b139dbd docs(perf): split the findings into per-subject markdown files
PHASE2-FINDINGS.md had grown past 1,200 lines mixing server memory, client rendering,
methodology and a long list of rejected experiments, which made it unusable as a
reference. Split under docs/perf/:

  README.md              headline results and the change-by-change ratio table
  SERVER-MEMORY.md       what the container's RAM is made of, layer by layer
  CLIENT-PERFORMANCE.md  dashboard cost in Chrome: DOM, fibers, images, paint
  REJECTED.md            ideas implemented, measured and abandoned, with numbers
  METHODOLOGY.md         the tools, and the measurement traps that gave wrong answers

PHASE2-FINDINGS.md is now an index so existing links keep working.

METHODOLOGY.md is the part worth keeping: every wrong number in this investigation came
from an instrument rather than the application, and each trap is written down - snapshots
cannot explain peaks, V8 truncates snapshot strings to ~1 KiB, snapshot objects are not
live handles, measuring without a forced GC measures V8's growth, taking a CDP snapshot
added 134 MiB to the process being measured, per-component React attribution silently
returns nothing on a production build, a fixed port can measure a leftover container, and
a server-side change that moves a client-side metric means the workload changed.
2026-08-10 19:08:20 +02:00

6.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Methodology, and the traps that produced wrong answers

Every wrong number in this investigation came from an instrument, not from the application. They are recorded here because each one looked plausible at the time, and several survived long enough to be published before being caught.

The harness

scripts/benchmarks/stress-restore.mts boots a fresh container, restores a supplied backup through the onboarding restore UI (including typing "I understand"), signs in, opens boards across several tabs, clicks into widgets, reloads, then soaks idle — sampling memory, CPU, browser heap, DOM nodes and listeners at each stage.

Each run proves it is actually behind a login rather than reading a public page: it asserts a cookie-less request to the private board is denied, requires the Auth.js session cookie after sign-in, and reports whether it modified the restored data at all.

The backup is passed by path via STRESS_BACKUP_ZIP and never enters the repository — it carries real integration secrets. .gitignore also refuses homarr-backup*.zip and loose *.sqlite.

Tools

tool answers
attribute-memory.mts cgroup → processes → address-space mappings → V8 spaces → loaded code, each layer reconciled against the one above
memory-probe.cjs injected --require preload: V8 spaces, module cache, buffer/fetch allocation sites, require graph, smaps, handles. Diagnostics only, never shipped
analyze-heap-dominators.mjs real retained sizes via a dominator tree, and expansion of the largest retainer
analyze-allocations.mjs allocation volume by site, diffable between two stages
analyze-smaps-stages.mjs RSS split into JS heap, JIT, native and file-backed, per stage
analyze-require-graph.mjs what pulled each module in
compare-stress-runs.mjs alternated runs, medians and per-run spread
measure-widget-cost.mts per-widget DOM nodes, fibers, heaviest components
measure-board-paint.mts image requests, bytes, style/layout/task time, layout objects
measure-widget-churn.mts idle churn attributed to a widget via DOM mutations

Metric choice

cgroup anon is the server-memory figure. It is non-reclaimable and is what a container limit acts on.

memory.current is not used for comparisons. It includes page cache and swung 192–261 MiB for the same image, and 60+ MiB between runs of a byte-identical build.

heapUsed is not server memory. It is one component. An early version of this work reported a heapUsed improvement as though it were the whole result.

The traps

A heap snapshot cannot explain a peak. V8 runs a full GC before serialising one, so it reports survivors only. The 94 MiB of transient ArrayBuffers that drove this container past 500 MB never appeared in a single snapshot. Peaks need an allocation profiler and wrapped allocators.

V8 truncates snapshot string contents to ~1 KiB. Grouping snapshot strings by content therefore compares only each string's first kilobyte. This produced a published claim of "7.86 MiB of literal duplicate chunk sources"; hashing the real files found zero byte-identical duplicates among all 3,055 server JS files.

Snapshot objects are not live native handles. A snapshot showed 15 Gzip objects still present at idle, which read as leaked zlib streams pinned by native handles — a real leak class that Next documents. process.getActiveResourcesInfo() reported Zlib=0, before and after 300 deliberately aborted gzip requests.

Measuring memory without forcing a GC measures V8's growth, not the module's cost. A require-cost sweep reported drizzle-orm at 124.3 MiB; with global.gc() before each reading the same measurement was a fraction of that. Two database drivers measured 21.4 MiB, not the ~30 MiB the naive sum implied.

The act of measuring can dominate the measurement. Taking a heap snapshot over CDP delivers it as JS string chunks: for a ~135 MB snapshot that added ~134 MiB of ArrayBuffers to the process being measured, and the next stage read 693.7 MiB. v8.writeHeapSnapshot streams from C++ instead, and the probe now reports its own observerCostMiB.

Per-component React attribution requires a profiling build. fiber.actualDuration is only populated by one, so on a production build every fiber fails the "did it re-render" test and the attribution tables come back empty — which reads as "nothing re-rendered" rather than "this build cannot tell you". This produced a published claim that the App Router re-rendered once a second. The tool now says which case it is.

When a server-side change moves a client-side metric, the workload changed. --jitless looked like −24% peak RSS, −14% CPU and 30% faster board loads. Three of those are impossible for a server flag. The client had 80% fewer event listeners: the page had simply under-rendered.

A fixed port can silently measure the wrong container. A readiness check passed against a leftover container on the same port while the container under test had not started. Ephemeral ports and asserting the container's own identity are the fix.

A completed build is not a built image. A docker builder prune running concurrently killed a BuildKit session; the build failed and the next step ran against a stale tag. Verify the tag exists.

Boards differ, so measure the right one. Peak memory is at nav-01, not the multi-tab stage — a GC lands during multi-tab and pulls RSS down. Measuring the obvious stage understates peak by 37 MiB.

Reproducing

STRESS_IMAGE=<image> \
STRESS_BACKUP_ZIP=~/Downloads/<backup>.zip \
STRESS_BOARDS="default,defaultv2" STRESS_TABS_PER_BOARD=2 \
STRESS_NAV_ITERATIONS=3 STRESS_SOAK_MS=120000 \
node --experimental-strip-types scripts/benchmarks/stress-restore.mts

node scripts/benchmarks/compare-stress-runs.mjs .bench/stress <before-prefix> <after-prefix>

For attribution, add the probe:

STRESS_MOUNT="$PWD/scripts/benchmarks:/probe:ro" \
STRESS_ENV="HOMARR_PROBE_PORT=9333,HOMARR_PROBE_TRACK_BUFFERS=32768" \
STRESS_NODE_OPTIONS="--require /probe/memory-probe.cjs"