docs: add Redis-backed initial data and ISR caching approaches
Documents two new performance optimization strategies in APPROACHES.md: Approach 7 - Redis-Backed TanStack Query Initial Data: - Use Redis cache as initialData for TanStack Query - Cron jobs already populate Redis; read from cache instead of DB - Estimated 2-5x faster TTFB, ~90% fewer DB queries per page load - Includes implementation path and code examples Approach 8 - Client-Side Rendering with ISR Static Shell: - Serve static HTML shell, fetch data client-side - Analysis shows this is NOT recommended for Homarr dashboards - Causes layout shift, breaks hydration, doesn't work with auth - ISR better suited for content sites, not interactive dashboards Includes benchmark comparison table and recommendation. Co-authored-by: ajnart <49837342+ajnart@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
a508fd1806
commit
38538a94f9
1 file changed
+179
+179
@@ -188,3 +188,182 @@ With all services in one process, Redis connection pools could be shared. Curren
|
||||
| 4. `--max-old-space-size` | Configurable | None | 📋 User option |
|
||||
| 5. Standalone output | Already optimal | None | ✅ Already done |
|
||||
| 6. Shared Redis pools | ~5-10 MB saved | Medium | 📋 Future |
|
||||
| 7. Redis-backed initial query data | Faster page loads | Medium | 📋 POC documented |
|
||||
| 8. Client-side rendering with ISR shell | Faster TTFB | High | 📋 POC documented |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Approach 7: Redis-Backed TanStack Query Initial Data
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 POC documented
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, the dashboard page (`/`) is fully server-rendered on every request:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Server calls `api.board.getHomeBoard()` (database query)
|
||||
2. Server prefetches all widget data via `prefetchForKindAsync()` (multiple database/integration queries)
|
||||
3. Server renders the full React tree with hydration boundary
|
||||
4. Client hydrates and takes over
|
||||
|
||||
Each page load triggers a cascade: **Client → Next.js Server → tRPC → Database → Back**. For data that doesn't change often (board layout, widget configurations), this is wasteful.
|
||||
|
||||
### Approach
|
||||
|
||||
Use Redis as a shared cache layer between cron jobs and page loads. Cron jobs already populate Redis with integration data. The idea is to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Cron jobs write to Redis** (already happening via `createItemAndIntegrationChannel`)
|
||||
2. **Server reads from Redis first** instead of hitting the database for widget data
|
||||
3. **Pass Redis data as `initialData`** to TanStack Query on the client
|
||||
4. **Client-side queries take over** with stale-while-revalidate behavior
|
||||
|
||||
```tsx
|
||||
// POC: In _creator.tsx, read from Redis cache first for widget prefetching
|
||||
import { createItemAndIntegrationChannel } from "@homarr/redis";
|
||||
|
||||
// Instead of always calling the database:
|
||||
const cachedData = await redisChannel.getAsync();
|
||||
if (cachedData) {
|
||||
// Use cached data as initial query data - skip the database call
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKey, cachedData.data);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Fall back to normal prefetch
|
||||
await prefetchForKindAsync(kind, queryClient, items);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
On the client side, TanStack Query's `initialData` option lets us hydrate from cache:
|
||||
|
||||
```tsx
|
||||
// Client component using cached initial data
|
||||
const { data } = useQuery({
|
||||
queryKey: ["widget", widgetId],
|
||||
queryFn: () => fetchWidgetData(widgetId),
|
||||
initialData: cachedWidgetData, // From Redis via server props
|
||||
staleTime: 30_000, // Consider fresh for 30s
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### How TanStack Query Initial Data Works
|
||||
|
||||
From the [TanStack Query docs](https://tanstack.com/query/v5/docs/framework/react/guides/initial-query-data):
|
||||
|
||||
- `initialData` pre-populates the query cache before the component mounts
|
||||
- The query still revalidates in the background (stale-while-revalidate)
|
||||
- Combined with `staleTime`, the query won't refetch until the data is considered stale
|
||||
- This means the page renders instantly with cached data, then silently updates
|
||||
|
||||
### PROs
|
||||
- **Faster page loads**: Redis reads are ~1ms vs ~50-200ms for database queries with joins
|
||||
- **Reduced database load**: Most page views hit Redis instead of SQLite/MySQL/PostgreSQL
|
||||
- **Leverages existing infrastructure**: Cron jobs already write widget data to Redis channels
|
||||
- **Graceful degradation**: Falls back to normal database queries on cache miss
|
||||
- **Non-breaking**: Can be adopted incrementally per widget type
|
||||
- **Shared across users**: Non-personal data (board layout, widget data) is the same for all users viewing the same board
|
||||
|
||||
### CONs
|
||||
- **Cache staleness**: Data may be up to one cron interval old (typically 1-5 minutes)
|
||||
- **Cache invalidation complexity**: Need to invalidate Redis when boards are edited
|
||||
- **Memory usage**: More data stored in Redis (marginal since it's already stored for pub/sub)
|
||||
- **Serialization overhead**: superjson parse/stringify on every cache read
|
||||
- **Testing complexity**: Need to test cache hit/miss/stale scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimated Impact
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Before | After (cache hit) | Improvement |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Dashboard TTFB | ~200-500ms | ~50-100ms | 2-5x faster |
|
||||
| Database queries per page load | 5-20 (depending on widgets) | 0-2 (board + auth only) | ~90% reduction |
|
||||
| Redis reads per page load | 0 | 5-20 | Acceptable (~1ms each) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Path
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create a `createBoardCacheChannel(boardId)` in `@homarr/redis`
|
||||
2. Populate it when boards are saved and when cron jobs update widget data
|
||||
3. In `_creator.tsx`, check cache before `prefetchForKindAsync()`
|
||||
4. Set `staleTime` to match cron interval for each widget type
|
||||
5. Add cache invalidation when boards are edited (`board.saveBoard` mutation)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Approach 8: Client-Side Rendering with ISR Static Shell
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 POC documented (not recommended for Homarr's use case)
|
||||
|
||||
### Concept
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of server-rendering the entire dashboard on each request, serve a **static HTML shell** via Next.js ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) and let the client fetch all dynamic content via TanStack Query.
|
||||
|
||||
```tsx
|
||||
// Hypothetical ISR dashboard page
|
||||
export const revalidate = 60; // Regenerate every 60 seconds
|
||||
|
||||
export default function DashboardPage() {
|
||||
// Return a static shell - no server-side data fetching
|
||||
return (
|
||||
<DashboardShell>
|
||||
<Suspense fallback={<BoardSkeleton />}>
|
||||
<ClientBoard /> {/* Fetches via useQuery on mount */}
|
||||
</Suspense>
|
||||
</DashboardShell>
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The client component would then fetch everything:
|
||||
|
||||
```tsx
|
||||
"use client";
|
||||
|
||||
function ClientBoard() {
|
||||
const { data: board, isLoading } = clientApi.board.getHomeBoard.useQuery(undefined, {
|
||||
initialData: undefined, // Could be populated from Redis via API route
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (isLoading) return <BoardSkeleton />;
|
||||
return <BoardContent board={board} />;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### How Next.js ISR Works
|
||||
|
||||
- On first request, Next.js generates the page and caches it
|
||||
- Subsequent requests serve the cached HTML instantly (TTFB ~0ms for CDN)
|
||||
- After `revalidate` seconds, the next request triggers background regeneration
|
||||
- The stale page is served until the new one is ready (stale-while-revalidate)
|
||||
|
||||
### PROs
|
||||
- **Near-instant TTFB**: Static HTML served from disk/CDN cache
|
||||
- **Reduced server CPU**: No React SSR on every request
|
||||
- **Scalable**: Static pages can be served by any CDN or reverse proxy
|
||||
- **Good for public boards**: Shared boards viewed by many users benefit most
|
||||
|
||||
### CONs
|
||||
- **Layout shift (CLS)**: Dashboard appears empty then fills in — bad UX for dashboards
|
||||
- **No SSR for SEO**: Not relevant for Homarr (it's a private dashboard app)
|
||||
- **Slower perceived load**: Users see a skeleton for 200-500ms while queries run
|
||||
- **Authentication complexity**: ISR pages must be the same for all users. Homarr's dashboard is user-specific (permissions, board access), making ISR caching ineffective for the page itself
|
||||
- **Breaks existing hydration pattern**: The current `HydrationBoundary` + `dehydrate()` pattern works well and ensures no layout shift
|
||||
- **WebSocket subscriptions delayed**: Real-time updates don't start until client JS loads and connects
|
||||
|
||||
### Benchmark Comparison (Theoretical)
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Current (SSR) | Approach 7 (Redis initial data) | Approach 8 (ISR + CSR) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| TTFB | 200-500ms | 50-100ms | ~10ms (static) |
|
||||
| Time to Interactive | 200-500ms | 50-100ms | 200-500ms (same) |
|
||||
| Largest Contentful Paint | 200-500ms | 50-100ms | 400-800ms (worse) |
|
||||
| Cumulative Layout Shift | ~0 | ~0 | 0.1-0.3 (worse) |
|
||||
| Server CPU per request | High | Low | Near zero |
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Approach 7 (Redis-backed initial data) is recommended over Approach 8 (ISR)** for Homarr because:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Dashboards are personalized**: Board access depends on user permissions, making ISR page-level caching ineffective
|
||||
2. **No layout shift**: Users expect the dashboard to appear fully rendered
|
||||
3. **Existing infrastructure**: Redis + cron jobs already provide the cache layer needed
|
||||
4. **Incremental adoption**: Can be applied per-widget without changing the overall rendering strategy
|
||||
5. **ISR is designed for content sites**: Blog posts, documentation pages, product pages — not interactive dashboards with real-time WebSocket subscriptions
|
||||
|
||||
ISR could still be useful for specific Homarr pages like `/manage/about` or documentation pages that don't depend on user state, but the main dashboard is not a good candidate.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user