Files
homarr/docs/perf
Thomas Camlong d2e86895f4 docs(perf): rewrite the client doc with the measured overlay results
Replaces the earlier version with what was actually measured, and closes out all 54
findings from the widget audit rather than leaving categories open:

  overlay-per-row (12)      5 fixed; 7 are functional tooltips with real labels
  index-key (11)            all safe - static text splits, or stateless rows from
                            user-configured JSONPath data with no stable id
  nested-component (2)      both fixed
  inline-style-per-row (29) left alone; a fresh object per row only defeats memoisation
                            if the child is memoised, and these are not

Measured, deterministic per-widget counts:

  mediaReleases      340 comp / 8387 fib  ->  170 / 8057
  calendar           171 comp / 1195 fib  ->   75 /  907
  beszelSystemTable   36 comp / 1286 fib  ->   18 / 1230

Records two metrics that turned out unusable - Chrome's board-level JSEventListeners read
7905 to 17114 across six runs of identical code, and its Nodes counter includes detached
nodes - and one claim withdrawn: the media-releases tooltip fix measured zero, the win for
that widget came entirely from the shared OverflowBadge fix.
2026-08-11 10:11:08 +02:00
..

Homarr performance investigation

Measured work on Homarr's memory and rendering cost, split by subject. Every figure here comes from a run of scripts/benchmarks/stress-restore.mts against a restored real backup — 4 boards, 51 widgets, 11 integrations, driven through an actual login — not from a synthetic or empty container.

document subject
SERVER-MEMORY.md What the container's RAM is made of, and the changes that reduced it
CLIENT-PERFORMANCE.md Dashboard rendering cost in Chrome: DOM, fibers, images, paint
REJECTED.md Ideas that were implemented and measured, then abandoned — with the numbers
METHODOLOGY.md The tools, and the measurement traps that produced wrong answers
NEXT-STEPS.md Handoff: what is unverified, what to do next, and the set for a clean PR

Headline result

Server RAM, merge-base 06724cfeb vs this branch, two alternated runs per side, reported as cgroup anonymous memory because that is what counts against a container limit and cannot be reclaimed:

stage before after change
peak 376.6 MiB 279.3 MiB −26%
boot idle 130.5 MiB 62.4 MiB −52%
after sign-in 247.4 MiB 142.9 MiB −42%
dashboard loaded 293.4 MiB 170.4 MiB −42%
4 tabs, 2 boards 366.5 MiB 258.2 MiB −30%
after 2 min idle soak 323.7 MiB 200.8 MiB −38%

No before/after range overlaps at any stage. The cost is +18% CPU (solid, non-overlapping).

The changes that did it, by ratio

change size effect
--max-semi-space-size=4 1 line −19% idle, −21% peak
preloadEntriesOnStart: false 1 line −52% anon at idle, 310 fewer files even at full load
Umami: stop fetching 100k raw events per refresh 1 file −26% peak, −93% transient buffers
serverExternalPackages (mysql2/pg + 8 more) 1 block −21 MiB idle
ssh2's 16 MiB WASM heap (docker-modem patch) 1 patch −15 to −18 MiB external
content-visibility on media-release cards 4 lines −59% image requests, −41% layout objects

What is left, and why it is hard

One lever has real headroom and it pays twice. Roughly 41 MiB of retained bundle source and ~38 MiB of V8 compiler zone memory both scale with how much JavaScript the server loads and compiles, and the largest single contributor is a 16.10 MiB subtree reached by every API route — the tRPC router importing every integration eagerly. Reducing that reduces both.

Everything else has been measured and closed: see REJECTED.md.