Thomas Camlong
083a926719
Completes the sweep: 11 fixed, 8 triaged, 10 read and found clean, 21 verified bounded. Each verdict records the evidence behind it, because "I read this" and "its list cannot get long" are different strengths of claim and should not look alike in a table. The four widgets the ranking flagged as most likely to hide something all came back clean, and three were already bounded before I looked - traefik slices to what its width shows, umami to its own limit option, beszel-alerts to options.maxHistoryItems. system-resources looked worst of all with 14 unmemoised maps, until it turned out none of the six chart components it feeds is memoised either, so a stable array identity would preserve nothing.
2.9 KiB
Homarr performance investigation
Measured work on Homarr's memory and rendering cost, split by subject. Every figure here comes from
a run of scripts/benchmarks/stress-restore.mts against a restored real backup — 4 boards, 51
widgets, 11 integrations, driven through an actual login — not from a synthetic or empty container.
| document | subject |
|---|---|
| SERVER-MEMORY.md | What the container's RAM is made of, and the changes that reduced it |
| CLIENT-PERFORMANCE.md | Dashboard rendering cost in Chrome: DOM, fibers, images, paint |
| WIDGET-AUDIT.md | All 50 widgets, one at a time, with a verdict and the evidence for each |
| REJECTED.md | Ideas that were implemented and measured, then abandoned — with the numbers |
| METHODOLOGY.md | The tools, and the measurement traps that produced wrong answers |
| NEXT-STEPS.md | Handoff: what is unverified, what to do next, and the set for a clean PR |
Headline result
Server RAM, merge-base 06724cfeb vs this branch, two alternated runs per side, reported as cgroup
anonymous memory because that is what counts against a container limit and cannot be reclaimed:
| stage | before | after | change |
|---|---|---|---|
| peak | 376.6 MiB | 279.3 MiB | −26% |
| boot idle | 130.5 MiB | 62.4 MiB | −52% |
| after sign-in | 247.4 MiB | 142.9 MiB | −42% |
| dashboard loaded | 293.4 MiB | 170.4 MiB | −42% |
| 4 tabs, 2 boards | 366.5 MiB | 258.2 MiB | −30% |
| after 2 min idle soak | 323.7 MiB | 200.8 MiB | −38% |
No before/after range overlaps at any stage. The cost is +18% CPU (solid, non-overlapping).
The changes that did it, by ratio
| change | size | effect |
|---|---|---|
--max-semi-space-size=4 |
1 line | −19% idle, −21% peak |
preloadEntriesOnStart: false |
1 line | −52% anon at idle, 310 fewer files even at full load |
| Umami: stop fetching 100k raw events per refresh | 1 file | −26% peak, −93% transient buffers |
serverExternalPackages (mysql2/pg + 8 more) |
1 block | −21 MiB idle |
| ssh2's 16 MiB WASM heap (docker-modem patch) | 1 patch | −15 to −18 MiB external |
content-visibility on media-release cards |
4 lines | −59% image requests, −41% layout objects |
What is left, and why it is hard
One lever has real headroom and it pays twice. Roughly 41 MiB of retained bundle source and ~38 MiB of V8 compiler zone memory both scale with how much JavaScript the server loads and compiles, and the largest single contributor is a 16.10 MiB subtree reached by every API route — the tRPC router importing every integration eagerly. Reducing that reduces both.
Everything else has been measured and closed: see REJECTED.md.